02/03/2026 7:30 pm
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
Other LLMs Forum
4
Posts
5
Users
0
Reactions
70
Views
0
So I’ve been using LLMs for dev work and quick scripts for like three years now and honestly thought I had the prompting thing down to a science. But man, I just started this part-time grad program in sociology and the essay requirements are kicking my butt. I tried using the standard GPT-4 stuff I use for work but it’s just not hitting the mark for these 4,000 word deep dives. It keeps getting repetitive or making up these fake sources that look totally real until you actually try to find them in the library database. It’s super exciting to see how far the tech has come though!!
I’m looking for something that actually understands academic structure and maybe has integrated source searching or something like that. My budget is probably around 25 or 30 bucks a month if it’s actually worth it and saves me from pulling all-nighters before my midterms in November. I’ve heard about stuff like:
- Claude (heard the context window is huge?)
- Perplexity for citations
- Maybe some of those specific dedicated essay apps?
I really need something that wont trip over its own feet when I ask for a complex thesis statement and 15 pages of analysis. What are you guys using lately that actually handles the long-form stuff without hallucinating half the bibliography?
4 Answers
11
02/03/2026 7:55 pm
@Reply #1 - good point! Tbh Scite.ai Assistant Annual is way better for research. I also like Jenni AI Plus Monthly for the actual writing part, it's pretty solid for the price.
11
02/03/2026 9:05 pm
> It keeps getting repetitive or making up these fake sources that look totally real ^ This. Also, jumping in here because I wasted a bunch of money on tools that were basically just wrappers. You might want to consider Consensus Premium Search for the research phase tho. Its much safer because it only pulls from real peer-reviewed papers. They have a student tier that fits your budget perfectly. Just be careful and read the full abstracts yourself... the AI summaries can kinda lose the nuance sometimes.
3
02/03/2026 7:31 pm
I once tried writing a long paper with basic LLMs and it hallucinated a whole book that didnt exist. You might want to consider using Perplexity AI Pro for research instead. Its safer because you can verify sources, but be careful with the page numbers... it still gets those wrong. I would suggest Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet for drafting since the logic handles sociology nuance much better.
1
02/03/2026 8:35 pm
> It keeps getting repetitive or making up these fake sources that look totally real until you actually try to find them in the library database. Just catching up on this thread and ngl, that source hallucination thing is exactly why I’ve almost given up on using these for high-stakes papers. I’ve been messing with these models since the early beta days and it still happens. I once spent a whole weekend chasing down a landmark study from 1994 that sounded perfect for my sociology thesis, only to realize the AI had just mashed two different authors together into a person who doesnt exist. It’s honestly exhausting. You’re paying these monthly fees hoping for a shortcut, but then you spend more time fact-checking the output than actually writing. If you arent careful, these tools will walk you right into a plagiarism meeting without you even realizing what happened. The repetition is the worst tho... once the word count climbs, the logic just turns to mush. It’s a huge time sink if you arent vigilant.
