Ive been using standard LLMs for a while now to help with my draft work but honestly they keep making up sources and its driving me crazy. My logic was just use them to help outline my thesis on solid state batteries but the references it gives are just totally fake.
Im about 3 months out from my deadline so I need something that actually connects to real academic databases like ArXiv or PubMed because doing this manually is taking forever. I looked at Elicit and Consensus but I cant decide if the paid tiers are worth it on a student budget. Are there any other tools that handle the heavy lifting of lit reviews without the hallucinations or maybe something that integrates with Zotero directly?
Like someone mentioned, hallucinations are a nightmare! Definitely try Scite Assistant Premium Plan tho... it's amazing for real citations and super budget-friendly. You're totally gonna crush that deadline!
Honestly, been super happy with Perplexity AI Pro Subscription for technical research lately. The tool pulls directly from academic indexes so hallucinations arent really an issue for me. For a tight budget, ResearchRabbit AI Tool Free Version is definitely the way to go. Its free and visualizes paper connections for solid state battery tech perfectly. This setup works well for my workflow:
I learned the hard way about fake sources when I was deep into my first big project last year. A tool I tried seemed perfect but it totally hallucinated a study on anode materials... really messy. You might want to consider being really careful with anything that doesnt let you click through to a real PDF. My current setup helps but I still double check every single link.
> they keep making up sources and its driving me crazy. Unfortunately, this is the reality right now and its super disappointing. I spent months trying to find a shortcut for lit reviews and most of these tools just arent as good as expected. Even when they claim they use live databases, they still mess up the interpretation of the actual data inside the papers. The biggest danger isnt just fake titles anymore. Its when a tool finds a real paper but then completely hallucinates the results to fit your specific prompt. Ngl, ive seen people get in real trouble because they trusted an AI summary of a legit study that was just plain wrong. Dont trust any tool that doesnt show you the actual paper alongside the summary. Honestly, if youre only 3 months out, sticking to the manual grind for the heavy lifting is probably safer. Cutting corners now is just asking for a disaster later on...
Can confirm this works. Did the same thing on mine and its been solid ever since.