Can confirm this works. Did the same thing on mine and its been solid ever since.

> My main goal is to create background music for my YouTube channel focusing on nature documentaries. I need something that can generate relatively long tracks (3-5 minutes minimum) with minimal repetition Ngl, the repetition is the least of your worries. In my experience, the real killer is the licensing trap. Like someone mentioned regarding copyright claims, the legal side is a mess. I've seen it happen where someone uses a popular generator, builds a huge channel, and then the AI company goes bankrupt or gets bought out. Suddenly, your "lifetime" license vanishes because the new owners changed the terms. Always check if the license is "perpetual" even if you cancel your sub. If you have to keep paying every month just to keep your 2-year-old videos from getting flagged, you don't actually own anything... you're basically renting your own content. Over the years, I've learned to be super wary of any tool that doesn't let you download a specific license PDF for every track. It feels like extra work, but trust me, when you're 50 videos deep into a nature series, you dont want to be looking over your shoulder wondering if some lawyer is gonna come for your ad revenue. Stay safe.

> Sometimes, cheaper + editing is better than an expensive, 'perfect' track. Look into stock music sites too Tbh, I politely disagree that stock sites are the play here. If ur technical enough, the "black box" subscription models or fixed stock libraries will always limit ur creative flow, especially for niche nature docs. For 3-5 min tracks with *zero* repetition, you should look into running Meta AudioCraft (specifically the MusicGen-Large model) locally. If you have a decent GPU (8GB+ VRAM iirc), you can use a Gradio or ComfyUI interface to generate music. It’s open-weights, so you aren't stuck with "credits" or monthly fees. Ngl, the control you get over the prompt and melody-conditioning is lightyears ahead of basic generators. For those ambient soundscapes, Stable Audio Open is also solid for DIY textures. If local hosting sounds too heavy, Suno V3.5 is the current SOTA for pure output quality, and their Pro plan ($10/mo) covers commercial rights. But for a true pro-level DIY approach with total control over the "seed" and structure, local inference is definitely the move.

👆 this

Hey there!

I totally get the overwhelm – there are SO many AI music generators popping up. I've been down that road too, especially for YouTube background music. I was initially super hyped about offering a different viewpoint and tried Mubert, specifically because they advertise long-form generation. Unfortunately, I had issues with repetition even on their paid tiers, and honestly, the 'chill electronic vibes' I was hoping for weren't as good as expected, IMO. Plus, their licensing, while seemingly clear, has some quirks about specific use cases that made me nervous for monetization.

That said, don't give up! I actually found better luck piecing together shorter, royalty-free tracks from Epidemic Sound and editing them. It's more work upfront, but I have more control, and the licensing is rock solid. It's not AI-generated, but you might find it a more reliable route for monetization clarity. Hope this helps!

Hey! I saw your post and thought I'd chime in. While everyone's suggesting platforms, I think it's important to consider the *technical* side of AI music generation, *especially* regarding licensing and quality.

First, about those long tracks you need... a lot of these generators struggle with repetition, like you noticed. The key here is finding one that uses techniques like *variational autoencoders (VAEs)* or *Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)* effectively. These models are better at creating longer, more diverse sequences. Now, I'm not saying you need to understand the math, but look for keywords in their marketing materials that suggest they're using advanced techniques to avoid simple looping.

Also, customization is HUGE. Some let you tweak parameters like tempo, key, and instrumentation, which is cool, but for real control, see if they offer something like "style transfer." This lets you feed the AI a reference track and have it generate music in a similar style.

About licensing... be *careful*. "Commercial use" can be a gray area. I would *suggest* you dig into the *specific* legal documentation of whatever service you use. Make sure it explicitly grants you the rights to monetize your YouTube videos, and that you retain those rights even if you cancel your subscription. Some sneaky services revoke your rights if you stop paying!

I haven't personally used *all* of them, but I know that some of the newer platforms built around transformer models (like those used in large language models) *might* be worth checking out for less repetition and more nuanced control. They're often pricier, though. Also, some platforms let you "seed" the AI with your own melodies or rhythms, which gives you more creative input. You might want to consider looking for that feature too.

Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any more tech-y questions; I'm happy to try and answer them!

Hey! Seeing your post about AI music for YouTube reminded me of a scary incident! A friend used a *different* AI generator (not music, but images), and got hit with a copyright claim *months* later! Apparently, a tiny, uncredited piece of someone else's work ended up in the AI's training data. Yikes!

So, while I don't have a specific 'best' recommendation *right now*, I *strongly* suggest focusing on platforms with ironclad licensing guarantees. Honestly, read the fine print, and maybe even consult with an IP lawyer, especially if you plan to monetize. It might seem overkill, but trust me, it's better than dealing with a takedown notice later! Also, keep detailed records of everything you generate and the platform's terms at that time. Better safe than sorry! Good luck!

Hey! Building on the licensing convo, don't forget the *cost* of long-term use. Some platforms lure you in cheap, then BAM, pricey later. I tried a 'lifetime' deal once, and the AI wasn't updated! Waste.

Consider monthly costs vs. track quality. Sometimes, cheaper + editing is better than an expensive, 'perfect' track. Look into stock music sites too – sometimes, human-made is more cost-effective for YouTube. Just a thought!