Im trying to use DeepSeek for some data analysis for my dissertation but Im struggling with the prompts. Ive read that chain-of-thought is key, but some people say just being super blunt works better? My logic was that detailed instructions would help, but it just rambles. How are you guys actually structuring these?
Building on the earlier suggestion, I am super curious what data formats you are actually processing? Knowing if you are crunching huge CSVs or JSON files would help me give you a better strategy! I personally love using:
Coming back to this, super pumped you are tackling your dissertation with it! DeepSeek can be a total beast for data analysis, but getting the prompt structure right is like unlocking a cheat code. Tbh, if its rambling, you probably need to be way more specific about the output format. Try asking it to return results only in code blocks or specific tables. Are you trying to parse raw logs or just cleaned datasets? Knowing that would change how I suggest you structure the logic. Quick tip: use a few-shot prompting approach where you give it one or two examples of exactly what you want it to produce before the actual data. Works like a charm! If you are running this stuff locally on a budget, look into the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core 4.5GHz Processor or even just grabbing more Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 5600MHz RAM to keep things snappy. Let me know what data format you are working with, we can definitely get this sorted!
^ This. Also, focusing on output constraints is just fantastic advice! Getting it to behave is all about reliability, honestly. If you want stable results for your dissertation, you really need to treat the AI like a precise instrument.
Honestly, I've spent way too much time testing different models for data tasks. In my experience, DeepSeek performs best when you give it a clear constraints-first structure rather than just rambling instructions. Over the years, I've found that chaining tasks works way better than one giant prompt. Here is what actually works for me: