Which Claude Code skills actually handle deep React component debugging without hallucinating? I keep reading that its great for boilerplate but bad at state management logic. Tried the docs and some reddit threads but they just talk about simple refactoring. Im stuck on a deadline for my freelance project in London and need to fix these hook loops fast...
Building on the earlier suggestion, I spent all last night refactoring a massive legacy dashboard where the state was just bleeding everywhere. Honestly, I stopped relying on general LLM agents for these deep hook issues because they get lost in the context window once you hit like 20+ files. I found more success moving to Cursor AI Code Editor with Claude 3.5 Sonnet because the codebase-wide index is just way tighter than running standalone Claude Code commands in the terminal. Here is what kept me sane while fixing those loops:
Been thinking about your hook issues. Honestly, Claude tends to lose the plot on complex state. You might have better luck with
> Im stuck on a deadline for my freelance project in London and need to fix these hook loops fast... Honestly, dealing with hook loops is a total nightmare. I usually find that Claude Code works best when you specifically point it at the dependency array first. Dont just ask it to fix the component. Ask it to map out the state lifecycle for that specific file. Itll actually trace the updates better if you feed it the surrounding context instead of just the snippet. Also, stop letting it guess the structure. If youre using complex state, give it the definitions first. I keep my local setup running on a Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M3 Max 36GB RAM so it can index the codebase locally without timing out during analysis. If the component is massive, just isolate the hook into a custom file. Claude handles the logic way better when the concern is separated from the UI boilerplate. One more thing, if its hallucinating the state updates, force it to write console logs for every state change before it tries to rewrite the logic. Seeing the sequence in the terminal usually snaps the model back into reality. Good luck with the London deadline, those are always brutal.