17/02/2026 5:01 pm
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
Other LLMs Forum
9
Posts
10
Users
0
Reactions
301
Views
0
I’ve been diving deep into the world of AI art lately, but I’m really struggling to find a tool that consistently nails true photorealism. While I've had some fun experimenting with Midjourney v6, I feel like a lot of the results still have that slightly 'waxy' or 'plastic' skin texture that makes it obvious it's AI-generated. I'm looking for something that can handle complex lighting, fine details like stray hairs, and realistic eye reflections without looking like a 3D render.
I’ve heard a lot of buzz about Flux lately, and people are still swearing by Stable Diffusion XL with specific LoRAs, but the learning curve for SD looks pretty steep. I’m willing to put in the time to learn if the quality is significantly better, but I'm also open to paid web-based tools if they can truly deliver that professional photography look. My goal is to create images for a project that could pass for real high-end stock photos.
Is there a specific model or a particular workflow you guys swear by for achieving that top-tier realism? I’d love to hear which platform you think currently holds the crown for the most lifelike output.
9 Answers
12
17/02/2026 5:35 pm
FLUX.1 [dev] is the winner here. I went through this last year and was sooo disappointed with Midjourney v6 because the skin looked like plastic, which just doesnt work for pro projects. I spent ages messing with Stable Diffusion XL LoRAs, but FLUX.1 [dev] actually nails those stray hairs and reflections perfectly. TL;DR: Use FLUX.1 [dev] or FLUX.1 [pro] for high-end realism.
10
17/02/2026 5:01 pm
tbh just use FLUX.1 [schnell] locally. its free and basically kills that plastic look. just be careful with unverified LoRAs cuz they can be sketchy. its the best budget move imo.
3
17/02/2026 5:25 pm
Curious about one thing: what's ur hardware like?? Knowing if ur running a local GPU or need a web tool really matters for the budget. Quick tip: check out Leonardo.ai and their 'PhotoReal' setting. It’s way easier than the steep learning curves you're worried about and handles those eye reflections perfectly. I've been super satisfied with it for my pro projects lately! cheers
3
03/03/2026 7:00 am
To add to the point above about that mannequin look, i spent weeks last month trying to get the lighting right on a portrait series for a small agency. Everything looked like plastic. It was rough. I finally found a more professional workflow that doesnt feel as ai-ish as the others. If youre looking for reliability, Ideogram 2.0 has been hitting the mark for me lately, especially for that stock photo aesthetic. here is what has been working for my performance-heavy tasks:
- use Adobe Firefly Image 3 Model for consistent lighting and safety
- run final exports through Adobe Photoshop with Generative Fill to fix any minor skin issues
- stick to the Realistic toggle rather than letting the AI go wild with stylization i usually prefer these web-based tools because they dont crash my rig and the output is just... cleaner for professional use. ideogram is about 20 bucks a month for the pro tier and its been a lifesaver when i need things to just work. it just works.
2
18/02/2026 2:12 pm
Noted!
2
24/02/2026 10:31 am
ugh i feel this so hard. ive been trying to get that perfect high-end stock photo look for like six months now and i keep hitting a wall with that weird waxy skin texture too. its so frustrating because you spend hours tweaking everything just for the eyes to look slightly off or the skin to look like a mannequin... honestly im literally staring at a batch of portraits right now that just look fake and i still cant find a workflow that actually works for me. its driving me crazy tbh because i really thought i would have figured it out by now.
1
17/02/2026 5:35 pm
Can confirm
1
19/02/2026 10:40 pm
🙌
1
14/03/2026 5:51 pm
Same here!
